Return-path: Received: from fmmailgate01.web.de ([217.72.192.221]:54052 "EHLO fmmailgate01.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751729AbZAIP7b (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:59:31 -0500 From: Christian Lamparter To: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] p54: p54spi driver Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:59:29 +0100 Cc: wireless , Johannes Berg References: <200901010201.44229.chunkeey@web.de> <200901091451.01499.chunkeey@web.de> <20090109144102.GA3371@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20090109144102.GA3371@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200901091659.29296.chunkeey@web.de> (sfid-20090109_165936_589927_5AA1162F) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Friday 09 January 2009 15:41:03 John W. Linville wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:51:01PM +0100, Christian Lamparter wrote: > > On Thursday 01 January 2009 02:01:43 Christian Lamparter wrote: > > > This patch series introduce the back-end driver p54spi for stlc4550/stlc4560 chips. > > > > > > So far no one complained about the patches or had any other issues... > > > => therefore it must be 100% working! > > > > > > [Please mind the logic gap ;-) , But I hope someone will respond > > > when the whole driver can be easily built with compat-wireless.] > > > > > > Regards, > > > Chr > > John? > > Yes? > > > I found a "few" bugs in the series, I'll do a re spin later... > > > > In the meantime, do you still have this patch somewhere in your inbox? > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg24853.html > > I have it. Are you saying I should drop it? Erm? you can drop the three patches for p54spi (and longbow support) for now. the "p54: fix oops caused by bad eeproms" patch on the other hand should be merged (in fact a month ago)?! Should I add it into the next patch series again? Regards, Chr