Return-path: Received: from 128-177-27-249.ip.openhosting.com ([128.177.27.249]:52112 "EHLO jmalinen.user.openhosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753324AbZALRff (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:35:35 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:35:26 +0200 From: Jouni Malinen To: Alina Friedrichsen Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed BSSID step 3: Don't merge with the same BSSID Message-ID: <20090112173526.GA18470@jm.kir.nu> (sfid-20090112_183552_201610_8DF61CD5) References: <20090106020130.302750@gmx.net> <20090108091055.GA7009@jm.kir.nu> <20090109205315.277310@gmx.net> <20090110091659.GC1170@jm.kir.nu> <20090112041534.24150@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20090112041534.24150@gmx.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 05:15:34AM +0100, Alina Friedrichsen wrote: > > For the particular problem that you are > > seeing, the minimal change would probably be just to make > > sta_info_flush_delayed() call conditional on SSID change (I don't think > > this would need to be based on BSSID change). > > If the others agree, I can implement it in the end of the week. Or do you want it the other way? > I personally don't want change too much...? Of course I would like to have the full cleanup in the long run, but I have nothing against first doing the minimal change to fix the identified issue. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA