Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:55852 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755362AbZAXOam (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:30:42 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: Set TSF fix From: Dan Williams To: Johannes Berg Cc: Alina Friedrichsen , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com In-Reply-To: <1232806972.4036.10.camel@johannes.local> References: <20090124081542.50450@gmx.net> (sfid-20090124_091614_136619_417AC6BC) <1232806972.4036.10.camel@johannes.local> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:29:16 -0500 Message-Id: <1232807356.2870.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> (sfid-20090124_153047_546673_FED5A83B) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 15:22 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 09:15 +0100, Alina Friedrichsen wrote: > > It seems that some Atheros hardware more like this code for setting the TSF. > > Why don't you back that claim by something more substantial? Yeah, at *least* which hardware likes it better, and some regression testing to ensure that other hardware doesn't break with the change. Dan