Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:43473 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750800AbZAEQ5P (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:57:15 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:11:05 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Felix Fietkau Cc: Andi Kleen , Larry Finger , Michael Buesch , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, John Linville Subject: Re: rate instability in wireless stack Message-ID: <20090105171105.GW496@one.firstfloor.org> (sfid-20090105_175717_665390_9D97C75C) References: <20090105050248.GG496@one.firstfloor.org> <496193A6.3040608@lwfinger.net> <20090105054830.GJ496@one.firstfloor.org> <49620BE5.9030507@openwrt.org> <20090105142343.GS496@one.firstfloor.org> <49621C36.70602@openwrt.org> <20090105152410.GT496@one.firstfloor.org> <49622686.9050005@openwrt.org> <20090105163553.GU496@one.firstfloor.org> <49623712.4060106@openwrt.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <49623712.4060106@openwrt.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > According to the rate control's view, only the 1M has a usable > success probability. It's rather insteresting that 11M is the only > other rate that had some successes. With this kind of results, the > only two options that I can think of are either a systematic tx > status reporting error (false negative for the IEEE80211_TX_STAT_ACK > flag), or something PHY related. Ok. Any more data I should provide to help tracking this down? Do you want the same from the RaLink? -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com