Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:9585 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751546AbZAWSuI (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:50:08 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so2643421fgg.17 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:50:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090123174050.GA12042@kroah.com> References: <45e8e6c40901230929r6efbf19xbe2c32bef92db8e@mail.gmail.com> <20090123174050.GA12042@kroah.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:50:06 -0800 Message-ID: <45e8e6c40901231050q714502ffk34fe16aea006b9e1@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20090123_195015_124063_39A4DA3B) Subject: Re: ath5k mesh in 2.6.28? From: Andrey Yurovsky To: Greg KH Cc: Bob Copeland , Keir , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 05188d21d21dc8976bff13a9ca73a230eef86d40 should apply to both .27 and .28 and it's useful in both places as it fixes a general problem with all Mesh Point interfaces and both kernels have Mesh Point support in mac80211. On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 09:29:22AM -0800, Andrey Yurovsky wrote: >> Sorry, looks like that's my mistake (I thought the patch had made it >> in). Greg -- thanks for queuing the patch. >> >> For completeness, I should note that ath5k mesh is later broken by >> "ath5k: Update PCU code" and fixed again (hopefully both in by >> 2.6.29!) by "ath5k: Correct usage of AR5K_CFG_ADHOC" >> >> Greg and Keir -- I also suggest Brian's patch, "mac80211: decrement >> ref count to netdev after launching mesh discovery", commit >> 05188d21d21dc8976bff13a9ca73a230eef86d40 for stable as it should apply >> there and fixes a bug that will sometimes prevent module unload if a >> mesh interface was active. > > Which stable kernel should this be for, .27 or .28 or both? > > thanks, > > greg k-h >