Return-path: Received: from venema.h4ckr.net ([217.24.1.135]:47993 "EHLO venema.h4ckr.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752518AbZAUHDQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:03:16 -0500 Message-ID: <1603.217.24.1.229.1232521394.squirrel@webmail.otaku42.de> (sfid-20090121_080327_129725_D1828C1B) In-Reply-To: <9664a4720901202016o3776205fk2a8bec6bb1331c90@mail.gmail.com> References: <9664a4720901201133g5671c7f0x718c4bd187b1d901@mail.gmail.com> <20090120200802.GF19581@tesla> <9664a4720901202016o3776205fk2a8bec6bb1331c90@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:03:14 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Atheros (madwifi/ath5k) virtual STA support From: "Michael Renzmann" To: "Catalin Patulea" Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi. Catalin Patulea wrote: > Also, I was under the impression that ath9k is only meant for > 802.11n chipsets (as opposed to abg), and therefore that AR5414 would > not be supported. What am I missing? ath9k is for Atheros' 11n chipsets, that's true. However, if Luis says that they are working on such a feature for ath9k, one can expect that this work will include patches for mac80211 which then other drivers can rely on to implement a similar feature. Bye, Mike