Return-path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.244]:58078 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751230AbZBCOpu (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:45:50 -0500 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c2so788186anc.1 for ; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 06:45:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1233670130.16539.5.camel@maxim-laptop> References: <20090131022310.GA3342@makis> <1233670130.16539.5.camel@maxim-laptop> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:45:48 -0500 Message-ID: (sfid-20090203_154600_222313_B8EACD3B) Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 1/5] ath5k: PHY code cleanup From: Bob Copeland To: Maxim Levitsky Cc: Nick Kossifidis , ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com, jirislaby@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > I just tried your 5 patches, as they could fix hangs in the device, > that I experience occasionally, when resuming my aspire one from ram. > > I applied the patches, and I got very unstable system, that tended to > hang even before X. > > When it didn't hang, I tried suspend to ram cycle, but it hanged then. Pretty much a known issue for some chips, I'm trying to bisect the changes right now (almost done). -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com