Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f161.google.com ([209.85.218.161]:49242 "EHLO mail-bw0-f161.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755302AbZBWVAe (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:00:34 -0500 Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so5199168bwz.13 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:00:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <49A30E6C.9010701@gmail.com> (sfid-20090223_220055_284483_F3610C1C) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:00:28 +0100 From: Xose Vazquez Perez MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH] Fix transmit LED on Acer Aspire One Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Bob Copeland wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:37 PM, John W. Linville > wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 02:07:05PM +1100, Peter Chubb wrote: >>> + /* Enable softled on Acer Aspire One */ >>> + else if (pdev->subsystem_vendor == 0x105b && pdev->subsystem_device == 0xe008) { >>> + __set_bit(ATH_STAT_LEDSOFT, sc->status); >>> + sc->led_pin = 3; >>> + sc->led_on = 0; >>> + } >>> if (!test_bit(ATH_STAT_LEDSOFT, sc->status)) >>> goto out; >> >> Any comment on this from the ath5k guys? That 0x105b subvendor ID >> would seem to correspond to "Foxconn International, Inc.", which >> doesn't sound much like "Acer"... > > It's already in wireless-testing with similar values. > > Not quite apropos to this patch, someone with the ambit chipset said > the values didn't match up with his laptop, so we do need to add a > subsystem_device test I think, but it should have a #define in pci.h. > In any case there's usually no harm in enabling the wrong gpio pin, > unless rfkill happens to sit there. from windows drivers: %ATHER.DeviceDesc.3067% = ATHER_DEV_04281468.ndi, PCI\VEN_168C&DEV_001C&SUBSYS_E008105B ATHER.DeviceDesc.3067 = "Atheros AR5007EG Wireless Network Adapter" regards, -- Polycommander, Erkowit, Urquiola, Andros Patria, Cason, Aegean Sea, Prestige, ...