Return-path: Received: from xc.sipsolutions.net ([83.246.72.84]:39118 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751271AbZBMVvh (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:51:37 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: split IBSS/managed code From: Johannes Berg To: Alina Friedrichsen Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com In-Reply-To: <20090213214354.67600@gmx.net> (sfid-20090213_224425_365749_2DF37F3C) References: <1234396421.16004.67.camel@johannes.local> <20090213203641.199830@gmx.net> (sfid-20090213_213711_951136_CAB188EF) <1234559990.4219.27.camel@johannes.local> <20090213214354.67600@gmx.net> (sfid-20090213_224425_365749_2DF37F3C) Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-6OwXrQP1O4DFhUMxsFNb" Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:51:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1234561892.4219.43.camel@johannes.local> (sfid-20090213_225142_008691_E7A6BEF6) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-6OwXrQP1O4DFhUMxsFNb Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Odd, I'm sure that worked for me. What hw are you using? >=20 > I have tested it with ath5k and atk9k. Without this patch (tag: > master-2009-02-12) beaconing works fine. Have you test it with a > passive scanner like kismet? No, only tried connecting it to my N810. > > > * If you create a new IBSS network it > > > scans for other networks to often > > > 3 times a second. > > > > That might've happened here too, but given that I never used ibss > > usually I didn't realise it was wrong ;) >=20 > This is to fast consecutively, so it scans and scans but it is not > listening on the working channel. Absolutely. > > > * If you join an existent IBSS it does > > > the following strange things: > > > > That does look a little strange, >=20 > The STA information is expired much to fast. This is all the same STA/Nod= e in an endless loop. Right, probably some assignment missing to the last_update or something. > > even if you disregard the fact that > > you're using compat without %pM :) >=20 > Why is a strange pointer used to display a MAC address, why not %x:%x:%x:= %x:%x:%x? (?) Well, you're using compat, and that doesn't know how to do %pM in lib/. johannes --=-6OwXrQP1O4DFhUMxsFNb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJJletfAAoJEKVg1VMiehFYdeoQAJVf/sj1YsOoIZ9F2CVEm42p kc3QvDSPhvO7uCHAiGBmNgVKwRVFBqrNqUTnvJ9spWW79ugrAjnkomPCl32qvS05 9alMXW/ZNzUO6aR+1bZPtEC6pnJxxl/f8zOtohJDxaiJLvxo2GQXHMU/FyZg3VOO wn1BRxi/NODiPaT6s62DfK6Ep57y+TSRYpkijIhuVf3Cb37G4Jz48wJy8JvJL97k LQvFyhJQzLmz0aACSH19AS01d8C0rDsweCbWyYyPbLXycfyVSZrkFt4wa59a6V73 KP+bckDe/b2zP7iHya317ggVHRLQyOfqpaoATBXzjB0CPbpsJPhhGqP9hqXFSqwA O8qRmHamI2Lu6Wxy+agEOZgCkopEM9aru6ZViYMXnElirXq56eaXiu5s5CAU+PaE k8XmmbLDz0t0bvfwbJRK+UA6MEuY1Vxhz0tIzqlpYocGmSZr9+PeqXrZYQGtNGOT k2AEtmlmpCtIEXL4XB1sPZ0DitQwg7xw0mCM8SMQGsA+ty1cu1IB0gRQwg4djmYQ Aj92V+nvRjrefVXxX3DjBKDrswLzlNls/SX1dDROaEUo2CiI8rZykgcn//TYnlsj ByBLQP/hAAPWqczsxtn/st79e3/KtsZMe71Zn9pqf0cKPKoppRh+Qjk8G9hg4unE naC74e1N2nyndJJOPolH =J1le -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-6OwXrQP1O4DFhUMxsFNb--