Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:48874 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758464AbZCMPAm (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:00:42 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:57:26 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Jouni Malinen Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Dan Williams , Johannes Berg Subject: Re: Which APs to disregards from in inputting into the bss list Message-ID: <20090313145726.GD5551@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20090313_160050_727451_AAF7CA61) References: <43e72e890903122009h25c7f6d9qcf4365ec32532e31@mail.gmail.com> <20090313080359.GA13826@jm.kir.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20090313080359.GA13826@jm.kir.nu> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:03:59AM +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 08:09:53PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > The benefit I see with these early checks we won't get complaints > > about not being able to connect to bogus APs or APs you shouldn't be > > connected to anyway. > > Those would be replaced with complaints about not seeing APs, scan > being broken, and not being able to connect to APs that we should be > able to connect to.. My thoughts exactly... -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.