Return-path: Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.171]:48640 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751694AbZCECPO (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 21:15:14 -0500 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so4253668wfa.4 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:15:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <18863.12298.203468.11014@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <1236103846-1672-1-git-send-email-juhosg@openwrt.org> <18862.1025.217829.656599@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <49AE851B.2070709@openwrt.org> <18862.36931.112561.497768@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <49AE96DA.9010208@openwrt.org> <18863.12298.203468.11014@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:15:12 -0800 Message-ID: <43e72e890903041815m7f483a05if3e01c4f054407c3@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20090305_031528_036476_002262F8) Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC] ath9k: use correct init values for ar9100 devices From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Sujith Cc: Gabor Juhos , "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "John W. Linville" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I'm a bit confused by this thread now, can a v2 patch be posted explaining clearly what's being done for each thing? Initval patches can hurt the eyes. Luis