Return-path: Received: from mail.atheros.com ([12.36.123.2]:10035 "EHLO mail.atheros.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754702AbZCXWPV (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:15:21 -0400 Received: from mail.atheros.com ([10.10.20.108]) by sidewinder.atheros.com for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:15:20 -0700 Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:14:44 -0700 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Bob Copeland CC: Luis Rodriguez , Christian Lamparter , Johannes Berg , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RFC] ath9k's regulatory domain code changes (for ar9170) Message-ID: <20090324211444.GC29268@tesla> (sfid-20090324_231544_300500_C8CD84E5) References: <200903241938.47155.chunkeey@web.de> <43e72e890903241310m1c09a55ex4c47aebdb483896e@mail.gmail.com> <200903242133.28405.chunkeey@web.de> <20090324205847.GB29268@tesla> <20090324220558.M48235@bobcopeland.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <20090324220558.M48235@bobcopeland.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 03:09:12PM -0700, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:58:47 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote > > > > > pick up where Luis left off on the weekend. > > > Done! Patch attached, please add to the tree ;) > > > > Nice....... so it seems all we need now is ath5k figured out and properly > > tested. > > BTW there's a dumb bug in my first patch, missing 'break' in the switch > statements. Oops. But ath5k wasn't using any of that since it didn't > do the CTL stuff yet. > > I'll go ahead and rebase the stuff and repost it later in the week, > as long as you guys can test ath9k/ar9170 then I can do the debugging > for 5k.. Nice, I think I can at least commit now to reviewing and testing ath9k stuff. The good news is this is all going for a .31 so we'll have a good amount of time to test. Luis