Return-path: Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.168]:10614 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750791AbZCMFuG (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:50:06 -0400 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so235179wfa.4 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:50:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <18873.58504.252509.729185@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <43e72e890903122009h25c7f6d9qcf4365ec32532e31@mail.gmail.com> <18873.53124.115355.862512@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <43e72e890903122118p5533bb4eke512f947c8879edf@mail.gmail.com> <18873.58504.252509.729185@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:50:04 -0700 Message-ID: <43e72e890903122250pcc4cfcdo68d5205999d40fad@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20090313_065012_994793_B22AC93F) Subject: Re: Which APs to disregards from in inputting into the bss list From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Sujith Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Dan Williams , Jouni Malinen , Johannes Berg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Sujith wrote: > Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Sujith wrote: >> > Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> >> Do we want to ignore certain APs if we determine they are bogus? An >> >> example is 11n APs with WEP/TKIP. >> > >> > They are not bogus, we just fall back to legacy association. >> >> What if its HT only. >> > > It should deny association, since we send only legacy capabilities > in our assoc request. But I doubt that HT-only APs exist. Well I have some, when I feel greedy I set my AP to HT-only. Luis