Return-path: Received: from mail.atheros.com ([12.36.123.2]:63349 "EHLO mail.atheros.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751200AbZCMDSX (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:18:23 -0400 Received: from mail.atheros.com ([10.10.20.108]) by sidewinder.atheros.com for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:18:22 -0700 From: Sujith MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: <18873.53124.115355.862512@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (sfid-20090313_041826_782104_8E8490E6) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:44:12 +0530 To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" CC: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Dan Williams , Jouni Malinen , Johannes Berg Subject: Which APs to disregards from in inputting into the bss list In-Reply-To: <43e72e890903122009h25c7f6d9qcf4365ec32532e31@mail.gmail.com> References: <43e72e890903122009h25c7f6d9qcf4365ec32532e31@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Do we want to ignore certain APs if we determine they are bogus? An > example is 11n APs with WEP/TKIP. They are not bogus, we just fall back to legacy association. Sujtih