Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:41:29 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	otus-devel@lists.madwifi-project.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][RFT][PATCH 0/5 v5] ar9170: ar9170 driver (aka mac80211's
	otus)
Message-ID: <20090320224129.GA13172@kroah.com> (sfid-20090320_234257_826759_F8FD5C19)
References: <200903170408.12626.chunkeey@web.de> <200903202214.51394.chunkeey@web.de> <20090320212515.GA12078@kroah.com> <200903202312.57737.chunkeey@web.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <200903202312.57737.chunkeey@web.de>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:12:57PM +0100, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> On Friday 20 March 2009 22:25:15 Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:14:51PM +0100, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> > > On Friday 20 March 2009 21:13:26 Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 08:36:08PM +0100, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> > > > > Based on the number of mails I got, this driver should be ready for inclusion.
> > > > > So, this is probably the last RFC and the official patches will follow on
> > > > > sunday (only if no one finds a bug that needs to be fixed ASAP.)
> > > > 
> > > > Wonderful!
> > > :-)
> > > 
> > > > When the driver goes into the "real" portion of drivers/net please let
> > > > me know and I'll drop the otus driver from the drivers/staging/
> > > > location.
> > > Well, I doubt that we can replace Otus, ever...
> > 
> > Why, what is lacking in the version you have that is in the otus driver?
> >
> Well, a few features that the vendors uses to encourage potential buyers:
> - HT ( 802.11n - aka 300mbps )
> - ANI (ambient noise immunity - so it works in noisy environments),
> - TPC/DFS (802.11h - crucial if you want to "blast" the 5GHz band 
> 		      in most countries)
> - AP/AD-Hoc 
> 
> comes to my mind. That said I didn't really look into otus to see which
> of these feature actually works as advertised
> 
> Nevertheless ar9170 should fit the bill for users with 802.11b/g
> accesspoint just fine.
> 
> and of course one could always argue that 802.11n is !still! a draft,
> 5GHz is not very widespread yet, and ANI only helps on very weak links...
> 
> However, I suggest that we wait and see what's the situation when
> the first ar9170 bits are about to enter vanilla... deal?

Sounds good to me, let me know what you want to do then.

thanks,

greg k-h