Return-path: Received: from pool-71-115-160-52.gdrpmi.dsl-w.verizon.net ([71.115.160.52]:34977 "EHLO s0be.servebeer.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751482AbZCQEpc (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:45:32 -0400 Received: from [IPv6:2001:4978:142:0:290:f5ff:fe3e:e3c7] (unknown [IPv6:2001:4978:142:0:290:f5ff:fe3e:e3c7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by s0be.servebeer.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3317252A7C for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:45:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <49BF2AE4.6010604@erley.org> (sfid-20090317_054538_067382_BE90214D) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:45:24 -0400 From: Pat Erley MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-wireless Subject: Re: [rfc] Implement ath9k mesh point operation References: <49BED464.2010904@erley.org> In-Reply-To: <49BED464.2010904@erley.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Also, I was able to do the development of this thanks to hardware donated by Johannes Berg (b43 card that was used as a baseline known working device) and an ath9k card donated by Oxford TEC[1]. What's the best way to add this 'credit' to the commit, or is it not appropriate? Pat Erley [1] http://www.oxfordtec.com/