Return-path: Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:50286 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755682AbZC3ULw (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:11:52 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LoNpk-0004gV-I3 for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:11:48 +0000 Received: from port-87-193-186-180.static.qsc.de ([87.193.186.180]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:11:48 +0000 Received: from thomas by port-87-193-186-180.static.qsc.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:11:48 +0000 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Thomas_B=E4chler?= Subject: Re: wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Germany (DE) on 5GHz Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:11:38 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20090330_221157_131472_6A9F708A) References: <1238113267.29544.14.camel@blob> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed In-Reply-To: <1238113267.29544.14.camel@blob> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Bernhard Seibold schrieb: > --- a/db.txt 2009-03-25 19:38:22.838975857 +0100 > +++ b/db.txt 2009-03-25 19:39:37.722248019 +0100 > @@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ > country DE: > # entries 279004 and 280006 > (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW) > - # entries 303005 and 304002 > - (5150 - 5255 @ 40), (N/A, 200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS > + # entries 303005, 304002 and 305002 > + (5150 - 5350 @ 40), (N/A, 200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS > # entries 308002 and 309001 > (5470 - 5650 @ 40), (N/A, 1000 mW), DFS > > What about 5650-5725? Shouldn't that be added as well? At least my university runs an AP at 5.7GHz.