Return-path: Received: from xc.sipsolutions.net ([83.246.72.84]:54985 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758700AbZCaSC1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:02:27 -0400 Subject: Re: [ipw3945-devel] 2.6.29-wl-36116-g6a982a0: connection loss From: Johannes Berg To: Christian Lamparter Cc: Kalle Valo , reinette chatre , Nico -telmich- Schottelius , linux-wireless In-Reply-To: <200903311957.39264.chunkeey@web.de> References: <20090331044946.GA10616@denkbrett.schottelius.org> <1238520041.5970.112.camel@johannes.local> <8763hpsi0a.fsf@litku.valot.fi> <200903311957.39264.chunkeey@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-KuxfCdFxJwjXAM1Pr+QU" Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:01:51 +0200 Message-Id: <1238522511.5970.114.camel@johannes.local> (sfid-20090331_200230_540548_8D6F3700) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-KuxfCdFxJwjXAM1Pr+QU Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 19:57 +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote: > On Tuesday 31 March 2009 19:45:57 Kalle Valo wrote: > > Johannes Berg writes: > >=20 > > >> Perhaps the new beacon filtering work [1] is changing more than it > > >> intended? > > > > > > I think it only changed the messages here. Previously, that message > > > simply wouldn't have been there, instead you'd only have seen the "No > > > ProbeResp from current AP - assume out of range" thing. > >=20 > > At least I have been using latest wireless-testing with iwl3945 all the= time > > (for example right now) and I haven't noticed any problems. > >=20 > > But your comment makes me think is the "beacon loss" message too > > verbose. Maybe we should remove it? > >=20 > > BTW, what are the AP settings (beacon interval, DTIM)? Was power save > > enabled in the driver? If the beacon interval is really long, like 1 > > second, our timer is far from optimal and missing beacon only once > > might trigger the warning. We should fix that properly at some point. > >=20 > and what is its tsf/last beacon in iwlist wlan0 scan? >=20 > e.g: > Extra:tsf=3D0000005a35738ad1 > Extra: Last beacon: 2180ms ago that would have to be 'iwlist wlan0 scan last' to actually give something marginally useful. johannes --=-KuxfCdFxJwjXAM1Pr+QU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJJ0lqNAAoJEKVg1VMiehFYA90P/RiVPpEtmrlaBF3WgX3GvN5j JRuDaziBU7Tsyk8NrEMx4yFMe2fIGjgL1dfhtDk8plaCACuLr2g4Ek6Fuzkw1iep WyYGrzbvJjxgqShgmeK3AkGy/6GZ5V8amN1bMXEfHtwchZpQUzmt1oe2fAlPb8EF 1GmY/O5aqgvfeVdKLDofFcr+BI2rQVI8fRjnRvYXxVaSj7nBzPPBwqBFPsLe0ls6 ytXwHkti5+9xinTqGIbahjh8l57k3W4CB45l2Xw56rXl17MCvbvypCV1vnCrQOfl gkkaIpgMw+tBU2XSCcA5pannvm6P10pKZkGjrS3akYg+D87vV9cXtA8jcpswxixV FXlE/uUZbdbKkX2C+dKiIEH3pSpq+gjxuPPBzT1XhYePRa7WrRsum2l1UFNb6SFI 1fgxdgiBGhMJMFTMTu7zO+PKWp/inopjfHmDUBkJBNeDozdSDBH8RcdPWpRerGVx B+ejnND1O1Opf+UWwZ52Ty/tIN3LxVSS+C06oaG3Bp/C3HUgVB4CZO6iIngjEuoL 4T0KejTySwQaxz2FkdJUCAbcWbf42GiKzuzKXMYNVpp22Wu5P9pw9V4kfxYeqQGm 1BXvouqnUrVM1l2JHG0TgnzHbehUXSdEPhyT6zFH6UBLro+mYuTGGK87Ik+JaYMW XmikkOjmee2tJVax6jFE =vD0B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KuxfCdFxJwjXAM1Pr+QU--