Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.218.169]:40891 "EHLO mail-bw0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751653AbZCaJlQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:41:16 -0400 Received: by bwz17 with SMTP id 17so2273001bwz.37 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 02:41:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8e92b4100903302354x66276239m48a14f2182d959c7@mail.gmail.com> References: <2da21fe50903270727m7b7007ctaa846aea61902436@mail.gmail.com> <87ljqr58oa.fsf@litku.valot.fi> <2da21fe50903271208m1c369c88lba8399416dace43a@mail.gmail.com> <8e92b4100903300238p4b0cbd3fh754a3dddbf904fa7@mail.gmail.com> <2da21fe50903300631o39779ac9ge42252fd4697dce@mail.gmail.com> <8e92b4100903302354x66276239m48a14f2182d959c7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:40:57 +0200 Message-ID: <2da21fe50903310240m2f18adf2ma23f095be397a9ea@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20090331_114121_891714_B4A6F242) Subject: Re: ath9k and power management From: Davide Pesavento To: Vivek Natarajan Cc: Kalle Valo , linux-wireless , mcgrof@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 08:54, Vivek Natarajan wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Davide Pesavento wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:38, Vivek Natarajan wrote: >>> >>> ath9k: No need to abort Rx path when autosleep is enabled. >>> >>> For chipsets supporting autosleep feature, there is no need to abort >>> Rx engine since they are capable of automatically going back to sleep >>> after receiving a packet. >> >> I've applied your patch but unfortunately the behaviour is still the >> same as before. > > One more patch sent: > ath9k: Disable autosleep feature for AR9285 based chipsets. > > I hope you are using one of the AR9285 based. I have unit tested and it seems to > work consistently now. > No, I'm not. Sorry for not reporting the hardware type earlier. My card is identified as: phy0: Atheros AR5418 MAC/BB Rev:2 AR5133 RF Rev:81: mem=0xffffc20005020000, irq=17 Thanks, Davide