Return-path: Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.170]:57878 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750825AbZCMESD (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:18:03 -0400 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so191399wfa.4 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:18:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <18873.53124.115355.862512@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <43e72e890903122009h25c7f6d9qcf4365ec32532e31@mail.gmail.com> <18873.53124.115355.862512@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:18:01 -0700 Message-ID: <43e72e890903122118p5533bb4eke512f947c8879edf@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20090313_051815_017454_89A4E5F1) Subject: Re: Which APs to disregards from in inputting into the bss list From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Sujith Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Dan Williams , Jouni Malinen , Johannes Berg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Sujith wrote: > Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> Do we want to ignore certain APs if we determine they are bogus? An >> example is 11n APs with WEP/TKIP. > > They are not bogus, we just fall back to legacy association. What if its HT only. Luis