Return-path: Received: from elmendorf.ojctech.com ([64.198.255.10]:63824 "EHLO elmendorf.ojctech.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753286AbZDPPsp (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:48:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:37:24 -0500 From: David Young To: radiotap@radiotap.org, linux-wireless Subject: Re: [Proposal]TX flags Message-ID: <20090416153724.GX25412@ojctech.com> (sfid-20090416_174847_884075_4F6A555F) References: <69e28c910904141733m72ce521ap8f1865bec991fff7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <69e28c910904141733m72ce521ap8f1865bec991fff7@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 02:33:05AM +0200, G?bor Stefanik wrote: > I propose the following suggested Radiotap features to be standardised: > > * A new, 16-bit wide "TX flags" field (field number 15), containing > the following flags: > - TX failed due to excessive retries, > - CTS-to-self protection, > - RTS/CTS-handshake, > - Frame shall not be ACKed ("No-ACK"), and > - Sequence number shall not be recalculated ("No-Seq"). Thanks. FWIW, these assignments are compatible with NetBSD. They appear to be compatible with FreeBSD, too. > If no one objects to this proposal in 7 days, I will resubmit it as a > formal RFA, to allow eventual adoption. Great! Dave -- David Young OJC Technologies dyoung@ojctech.com Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933