Return-path: Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:33565 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753741AbZD2P56 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:57:58 -0400 To: reinette chatre Cc: Andrew Morton , "Zhu, Yi" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mm-commits@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: mmotm 2009-04-27-15-45 uploaded - iwl3945 oops In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:39:44 PDT." <1240951184.1207.11.camel@rc-desk> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <200904272305.n3RN51mu031395@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <25818.1240938876@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <1240951184.1207.11.camel@rc-desk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1241020608_4397P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:56:48 -0400 Message-ID: <24133.1241020608@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (sfid-20090429_175814_615334_EC044740) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --==_Exmh_1241020608_4397P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:39:44 PDT, reinette chatre said: > Could you please revert this and test again? > > If this does not help, could you please bisect? Same kernel that oopsed 2 nights ago failed to do so in 8 or 9 hours last night - so it isn't a "fire up wpa_supplicant and know inside 20 or 30 seconds if the kernel tested is good" candidate for bisection. Will collect what info I can. --==_Exmh_1241020608_4397P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFJ+HjAcC3lWbTT17ARAoY2AJ9Mo5LJskC3QkgOuboLi91suvei8wCg8pDO 9qMg0BEieIa5hB5sfpKcFFg= =v625 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1241020608_4397P--