Return-path: Received: from senator.holtmann.net ([87.106.208.187]:35095 "EHLO mail.holtmann.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751212AbZDVH1X (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Apr 2009 03:27:23 -0400 Subject: Re: Problem with IEEE80211_MONITORING_INTERVAL From: Marcel Holtmann To: Kalle Valo Cc: Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Jouni Malinen In-Reply-To: <874owhffe5.fsf@litku.valot.fi> References: <1239837672.11795.46.camel@violet> <1239875168.9737.10.camel@johannes.local> <1240247636.5260.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1240248008.4632.10.camel@johannes.local> <1240248385.5260.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1240248773.4632.13.camel@johannes.local> <1240343775.3327.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <874owhffe5.fsf@litku.valot.fi> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:27:18 +0100 Message-Id: <1240385238.3404.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> (sfid-20090422_092727_321071_BC3D586A) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Kalle, > > so I have built the latest wireless-testing tree with a new patches sent > > by Reinette fixing the DMA issue. So far I have no problems and I am > > unable to re-produce it. However this is a different AP and I disabled > > the power control feature for now. > > > > I also updated wpa_supplicant and iw to the latest code and assume that > > no fix in there silently fixed it for me. > > > > So we are suspecting that this issue was because of me having 3GB of RAM > > and running on a 64-bit kernel. Does this makes sense and could be the > > problem why it kept failing until I unload the iwlagn driver? > > I would say that don't make any assumptions until you manage to test > with the original AP. APs can be broken so many ways. I would agree with that in general, but I haven been using that AP for over a year now successfully with the 4965 card in my X61. No problems ever. Regards Marcel