Return-path: Received: from mail.atheros.com ([12.36.123.2]:37054 "EHLO mail.atheros.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755593AbZETIEJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2009 04:04:09 -0400 Received: from mail.atheros.com ([10.10.20.108]) by sidewinder.atheros.com for ; Wed, 20 May 2009 01:04:11 -0700 Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 13:33:04 +0530 From: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" CC: linux-wireless , Vasanth Thiagarajan Subject: Re: ath9k oops - in ath_get_rate+0x468 - Fatal exception in interrupt Message-ID: <20090520080303.GA16219@vasanth-laptop> References: <43e72e890905191522j37fb71das9289ef580b9e6ff5@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <43e72e890905191522j37fb71das9289ef580b9e6ff5@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 03:52:29AM +0530, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > (gdb) l *(ath_get_rate+0x468) > 0x202f8 is in ath_get_rate (drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/rc.c:744). > 739 } > 740 > 741 if (rate > (ath_rc_priv->rate_table_size - 1)) > 742 rate = ath_rc_priv->rate_table_size - 1; > 743 > 744 ASSERT((rate_table->info[rate].valid && > 745 (ath_rc_priv->ht_cap & WLAN_RC_DS_FLAG)) || > 746 (rate_table->info[rate].valid_single_stream && > 747 !(ath_rc_priv->ht_cap & WLAN_RC_DS_FLAG))); > Most probably we are using wrong rate table at this moment. This is possible only when we failt during channel set after completing the scan. Can you please confirm if you are seeing failures during channel set after changing this assert into warning?. Vasanth