Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bu3sch.de ([62.75.166.246]:51162 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751013AbZE3I7G (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 30 May 2009 04:59:06 -0400
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Matthieu CASTET <castet.matthieu@free.fr>
Subject: Re: b43 vs b43legacy
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 10:58:11 +0200
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
References: <loom.20090529T190620-42@post.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <loom.20090529T190620-42@post.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-Id: <200905301058.12079.mb@bu3sch.de>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On Friday 29 May 2009 21:19:23 Matthieu CASTET wrote:
> In the latter case why code for older chip (<5) is not removed from the driver ?

Nobody cares to do so.

-- 
Greetings, Michael.