Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f115.google.com ([209.85.222.115]:51873 "EHLO mail-pz0-f115.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751485AbZERRw5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2009 13:52:57 -0400 Received: by pzk13 with SMTP id 13so2088866pzk.33 for ; Mon, 18 May 2009 10:52:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090518123858.GA2814@tuxdriver.com> References: <43e72e890905141052o1f072bc5m4bc5922327617f8b@mail.gmail.com> <1242327298.4227.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <43e72e890905141207m3c27588ex13190b2ed6010e30@mail.gmail.com> <1242334636.4227.134.camel@localhost.localdomain> <43e72e890905141426k479e6707xb4f3d07d7420e7ea@mail.gmail.com> <43e72e890905152312m2077cc1dqd743cf7f625e9a49@mail.gmail.com> <1242478657.10005.72.camel@johannes.local> <20090518123858.GA2814@tuxdriver.com> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:52:39 -0700 Message-ID: <43e72e890905181052p2d227004ie2bfc401f256d729@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Scan while TX/RX'ing a lot of data To: "John W. Linville" , Senthil Balasubramanian Cc: Johannes Berg , Dan Williams , linux-wireless , Aeolus.Yang@atheros.com, Gaurav.Jauhar@atheros.com, David Miller , Jouni Malinen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:38 AM, John W. Linville wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 02:57:37PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > >> Anyway, bottom line is that I don't think we should change the APIs in >> any way, we should instead make the scan smarter by spreading it out if >> we're active. This even applies to scanning while in an IBSS -- stop >> beaconing, then go scan etc. > > ACK OK FYI -- I think Senthil is up for taking this on. Luis