Return-path: Received: from 42.248.sfcn.org ([160.7.248.42]:37204 "HELO mail.mypals.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751578AbZEMF3L (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 01:29:11 -0400 From: Alf To: Nick Kossifidis Subject: Re: ath5k in 2.6.29.1 won't associate with AP Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 23:29:14 -0600 Cc: Bob Copeland , Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho , Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <200905021218.23747.alf@mypals.org> <200905052142.38780.alf@mypals.org> <40f31dec0905120636i592e29e3n29b88c763fd9739e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <40f31dec0905120636i592e29e3n29b88c763fd9739e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <200905122329.14829.alf@mypals.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 12 May 2009 07:36:04 am Nick Kossifidis wrote: > Hmm, do you use a driver from your vendor (the inf files etc from CD) > or a generic one from the net ? I downloaded them from DLink's website. They have two versions, I used the older one. The most recent didn't work. > It's possible that your vendor uses hardcoded settings on the driver > instead of EEPROM settings so tx power wont work as expected and > that's why you can't connect on the AP. Both ath5k and MadWiFi try to > use EEPROM settings, they don't use any hardcoded settings (not even > default values in case of a corrupted EEPROM -we should fix that in > the future). That's one possible explanation. I can send you the driver I'm using through ndiswrapper to test your hypothesis. You can also send me a patch that would set the power level to a hardcoded value instead of the EEPROM to test it as well. Just let me know how I can be of help in finding and fixing the problem. -- Alf @