Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com ([209.85.218.213]:53784 "EHLO mail-bw0-f213.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753963AbZFKPyv (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:54:51 -0400 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so1553825bwz.37 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:54:52 -0700 (PDT) To: Bob Copeland Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, pierre@ossman.eu, san@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/7] wl12xx SDIO interface References: <1244685780-28930-1-git-send-email-me@bobcopeland.com> From: Kalle Valo Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:54:47 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1244685780-28930-1-git-send-email-me@bobcopeland.com> (Bob Copeland's message of "Wed\, 10 Jun 2009 22\:02\:53 -0400") Message-ID: <874oumyddk.fsf@litku.valot.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Bob Copeland writes: > Here's v2 of the SDIO interface for wl12xx, still with a FIXME or two. > > For my part, this is mainly a port of the Google/TI Android SDIO > interface logic to the existing SPI driver. I have confirmed that > the driver associates and sends some traffic. I quickly read the patches and they look really good. Thanks a lot for your work on this, you have done a great job. About the plan how to merge these. I have quite a big pile of patches pending for submission and I hope to send them either tomorrow or latest on Monday. Unfortunately the patches will conflict your patches, but I can rebase your sdio patches on top of my patches. It shouldn't take that long. Only problem is that I don't have a device to test the SDIO, so I might need your help with that. Sorry about the mess, I have been sitting on top of the wl1251 patches way too long. -- Kalle Valo