Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:22271 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752638AbZFRPjt (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:39:49 -0400 Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] mac80211: disassociate when switching bands and not scanning From: reinette chatre To: "John W. Linville" Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Johannes Berg , Kalle Valo , "Zhu, Yi" , "j@w1.fi" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" , "Abbas, Mohamed" , "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" In-Reply-To: <20090618150119.GD2738@tuxdriver.com> References: <1244666131-20031-1-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <1244666973.20900.399.camel@rc-desk> <43e72e890906101349t502e9022h16fa79ea512f8b4d@mail.gmail.com> <1244667817.20900.402.camel@rc-desk> <43e72e890906101404l6a8bee67r560f7c8a1c5f8c36@mail.gmail.com> <1244668077.4706.4.camel@johannes.local> <43e72e890906101542l5064384auf027267a3d19f3ee@mail.gmail.com> <43e72e890906101544i22bacc8fxa0a7d045eea50280@mail.gmail.com> <43e72e890906111204g18e71720w97cb2ea346e5d663@mail.gmail.com> <1244753407.20900.456.camel@rc-desk> <20090618150119.GD2738@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:47:01 -0700 Message-Id: <1245340021.24303.302.camel@rc-desk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi John, On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 08:01 -0700, John W. Linville wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 01:50:07PM -0700, reinette chatre wrote: > > > I ran the steps to reproduce on a kernel that is the latest > > wireless-testing + "mac80211: disconnect when user changes channel" + > > "iwlwifi: remove rs_get_rate workaround". Unfortunately I still get the > > rs_get_rate warning. > > Should I merge the ath9k rate series w/o "iwlwifi: remove rs_get_rate > workaround"? The later patch "mac80211: add helper for management / no-ack frame rate decision" also touches iwlwifi and assumes that "iwlwifi: remove rs_get_rate workaround" has been applied. I do not know if Luis would want that patch to go in because the warning we get may not be specific to iwlwifi. If you do want that to go in then please remove the iwlwifi bits. Reinette