Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:45317 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753764AbZFOMPc (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:15:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:04:23 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Oliver Hartkopp Cc: Marcel Holtmann , David Miller , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net Subject: Re: rfkill regression in net-next-2.6 Message-ID: <20090615120422.GA2729@tuxdriver.com> References: <20090604152011.GC2839@tuxdriver.com> <20090607.033751.191866033.davem@davemloft.net> <4A2BCC41.1060508@hartkopp.net> <20090607145830.GA2736@tuxdriver.com> <4A2BD8A5.4040302@hartkopp.net> <1244388583.23850.87.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4A34BAB9.9000104@hartkopp.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4A34BAB9.9000104@hartkopp.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:54:17AM +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > Any idea what changed in net-next-2.6 that could produce this behaviour? The rfkill subsystem rewrite would seem suspect... :-) John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.