Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:45885 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752818AbZFOUvf (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:51:35 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Alan Stern Subject: Re: [linux-pm] PCI hotplug v.s. suspend Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:51:50 +0200 Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Alan Jenkins , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200906152251.51648.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Monday 15 June 2009, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > I'm not sure whether the example is trustworthy. There was some > > > discussion quite a while ago regarding whether drivers should free > > > their IRQs during suspend, but I don't remember what the outcome was. > > > > No, they shouldn't. > > > > That's why we do the entire suspend_device_irqs() thing etc. > > Looks like the Documentation/power/pci.txt file needs to be updated. > No surprise, it hasn't been touched in well over a year and there > haven't been any meaningful updates in four years. Sure it does, but PCI PM has been a moving target for quite some time. I hope it's going to settle down now. Best, Rafael