Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f210.google.com ([209.85.219.210]:35772 "EHLO mail-ew0-f210.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759472AbZFIIaB (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 04:30:01 -0400 Message-ID: <4A2E1DE3.4020509@tuffmail.co.uk> Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:31:31 +0100 From: Alan Jenkins MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mattia Dongili CC: Johannes Berg , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , linux acpi Subject: Re: [PATCH] sony-laptop: no need to unblock rfkill on load References: <4A2CE86F.9040209@tuffmail.co.uk> <1244457418.18863.8.camel@johannes.local> <20090608224915.GA4583@kamineko.org> In-Reply-To: <20090608224915.GA4583@kamineko.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Mattia Dongili wrote: > On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 12:36:58PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > >> On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 11:31 +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote: >> >>> The re-written rfkill core ensures rfkill devices are initialized to >>> the system default state. The core calls set_block after registration >>> so the driver shouldn't need to. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins >>> >> Good catch, thanks. >> > > Just to confirm, is this patch going to sit in the wireless-testing tree > and you will submit it for inclusion together with the rfkill work > right? > Yes. I probably didn't need to ping you at this point. It just bothered me because I was effectively reverting a recent commit. I figuired I should let you know. In case it didn't work, when it was merged you'd know why I did it and who to blame. But there is always Git history for that :-). Regards Alan