Return-path: Received: from mail.atheros.com ([12.36.123.2]:10268 "EHLO mail.atheros.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757940AbZFKKlQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 06:41:16 -0400 Received: from mail.atheros.com ([10.10.20.108]) by sidewinder.atheros.com for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:41:19 -0700 Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:09:55 +0530 From: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan To: Johannes Berg CC: Vasanth Thiagarajan , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Luis Rodriguez Subject: Re: [RFT 2/3] ath9k: port to cfg80211 rfkill Message-ID: <20090611103954.GE10126@vasanth-laptop> References: <20090602111027.460530075@sipsolutions.net> <20090602111112.191915040@sipsolutions.net> <20090610132015.GA10126@vasanth-laptop> <1244644712.26814.6.camel@johannes.local> <20090611065203.GC10126@vasanth-laptop> <1244714262.4706.7.camel@johannes.local> <20090611095949.GD10126@vasanth-laptop> <1244715003.4706.10.camel@johannes.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <1244715003.4706.10.camel@johannes.local> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 03:40:03PM +0530, Johannes Berg wrote: > > But that's undesirable, especially if for some reason we already know > it's in rfkill, we really want to know about the rfkill state even when > the interface is down so userspace can properly react to it and not even > give the user the option of bringing the interfaces up. > > Hence my suggestion of moving the start_polling(). I agree, will move it to ath9k_start(). Vasanth