Subject: Re: ar9170 vs otus advice?
From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@bigfootnetworks.com>
To: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <200906032032.25344.chunkeey@web.de>
References: <1243894020.1559.22.camel@bigfoot-m4a75t>
	 <200906030337.27448.chunkeey@web.de>
	 <1244044799.1559.38.camel@bigfoot-m4a75t>
	 <200906032032.25344.chunkeey@web.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:09:58 -0500
Message-Id: <1244052598.1559.42.camel@bigfoot-m4a75t>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 20:32 +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote:

> I'm not aware of any problems with/as a 802.11a/b/g station,
> no one has reported any so far: so a/b/g works as _advertised_.
> (at least for me and other developers)

OK, good!

> > Is the in-tree Otus up-to-date with all of these workarounds?
> I'm not really sure. the latest (and last) otus driver can be found here:
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mcgrof/otus/
> 
> That said, I could get a decent HT20 (up to 70Mbits tx & 90 Mbit rx)
> performance with the in-kernel driver... Does it work for you as well,
> or are you asking, because it doesn't?

I'm just working on setting expectations (mine) so far,
and getting a handle on what is presumed working so that
I may choose the correct starting point for some work I
would like to do.  I've not tested it yet.

> Regards,
> 	Chr

Thanks,
jdl