Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f210.google.com ([209.85.219.210]:45426 "EHLO mail-ew0-f210.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763147AbZFKOyg convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:54:36 -0400 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so2089811ewy.37 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:54:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Florian Fainelli To: =?iso-8859-1?q?G=E1bor_Stefanik?= Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/7] wl12xx SDIO interface Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:54:33 +0200 Cc: Bob Copeland , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, pierre@ossman.eu, kalle.valo@iki.fi, san@google.com References: <1244685780-28930-1-git-send-email-me@bobcopeland.com> <69e28c910906110738r54f8cecdv3c5f8dcd58b8b6c8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <69e28c910906110738r54f8cecdv3c5f8dcd58b8b6c8@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200906111654.34324.florian@openwrt.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le Thursday 11 June 2009 16:38:46 G?bor Stefanik, vous avez ?crit?: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Bob Copeland wrote: > > Here's v2 of the SDIO interface for wl12xx, still with a FIXME or two. > > > > For my part, this is mainly a port of the Google/TI Android SDIO > > interface logic to the existing SPI driver. ?I have confirmed that > > the driver associates and sends some traffic. > > > > Pierre, hoping to get your perspective on the SDIO bits in patch 7, > > since I very likely don't know what I'm doing :) ?Especially regarding > > the platform code setup, in which the correct GPIOs have to be written > > to turn on the device before probe will work. ?For the SPI interface, > > we use spi_register_board_info() for a similar purpose, but I'm not > > sure if there is a standard way to do that for SDIO. ?This copies > > Google's platform driver for now. > > > > Conversion to readl/writel etc where appropriate is TODO. > > > > Bob Copeland (7): > > ?wl12xx: separate bus i/o code into io.c > > ?wl12xx: use wiphy_dev instead of wl->spi->dev > > ?wl12xx: introduce wl12xx_if_operations struct > > ?wl12xx: make wl12xx_set_partition bus agnostic > > ?wl12xx: move module probe methods into spi.c > > ?wl12xx: split spi interface into separate module > > ?wl12xx: add sdio support > > > > ?drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/Kconfig ?| ? 24 +++- > > ?drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/Makefile | ? 10 +- > > ?drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/acx.c ? ?| ? ?3 +- > > ?drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/boot.c ? | ? ?3 +- > > ?drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/cmd.c ? ?| ? 15 +- > > ?drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/event.c ?| ? ?6 +- > > ?drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/io.c ? ? | ?181 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > ?drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/io.h ? ? | ? 62 +++++++ > > ?drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/main.c ? | ?152 ++++-------------- > > ?drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/ps.c ? ? | ? ?3 +- > > ?drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/rx.c ? ? | ? 10 +- > > ?drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/sdio.c ? | ?250 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/spi.c ? ?| ?289 > > ++++++++++++++------------------- drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/spi.h ? ?| > > ? 40 ----- > > ?drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/tx.c ? ? | ? 64 ++++---- > > ?drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251.c | ? ?9 +- > > ?drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl12xx.h | ? 14 ++- > > ?17 files changed, 752 insertions(+), 383 deletions(-) > > ?create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/io.c > > ?create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/io.h > > ?create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/sdio.c > > Can we expect vlynq any time soon? That would be really great. FYI, vlynq bus support was added to -mm tree few days ago. Do you guys know how much wl12xx differs from acx111 ? -- Best regards, Florian Fainelli Email : florian@openwrt.org http://openwrt.org -------------------------------