Return-path: Received: from iolanthe.rowland.org ([192.131.102.54]:52010 "HELO iolanthe.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1758865AbZFOUed (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:34:33 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:34:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Alan Stern To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Alan Jenkins , , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Subject: Re: [linux-pm] PCI hotplug v.s. suspend In-Reply-To: <200906152158.30989.rjw@sisk.pl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > I'm not sure whether the example is trustworthy. There was some > > discussion quite a while ago regarding whether drivers should free > > their IRQs during suspend, but I don't remember what the outcome was. > > No, they shouldn't. > > That's why we do the entire suspend_device_irqs() thing etc. Looks like the Documentation/power/pci.txt file needs to be updated. No surprise, it hasn't been touched in well over a year and there haven't been any meaningful updates in four years. Alan Stern