Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f222.google.com ([209.85.218.222]:41587 "EHLO mail-bw0-f222.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759370AbZFBI3z (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2009 04:29:55 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1243930893.3192.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1243868091-5315-3-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> <69e28c910906010921r56cf7017gc858cb7ba819c385@mail.gmail.com> <20090601203348.GC7143@doriath.ww600.siemens.net> <200906021010.49613.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> <1243930893.3192.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:29:55 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: =?KOI8-R?B?79TXxdQ6IFtQQVRDSCAxMC8xMF0gaWVlZTgwMjE1NDogYWRkIGF0ODZyZjIzMC8=?= =?KOI8-R?B?cmYyMzEgc3BpIGRyaXZlcg==?= From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: Holger Schurig , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor_Stefanik?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, slapin@ossfans.org, maxim.osipov@siemens.com, dmitry.baryshkov@siemens.com, oliver.fendt@siemens.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2009/6/2, Marcel Holtmann : > Hi Holger, > >> > I thought about drivers/net as about ip (well, more or less) >> > network drivers. We have drivers/atm or drivers/bluetooth (and >> > bluetooth is 802.15.1...). >> >> I actually like that this is drivers/bluetooth and not >> drivers/ieee802151. Would you consider drivers/zigbee instead of >> drivers/ieee802154 ??? > > I fully agree here. > > Please use "zigbee" instead of "ieee*" names since that can become messy > and confusing. I know that in theory the IEEE part of ZigBee is more > low-level radio and could be used by non-ZigBee devices, but that is not > gonna happen anyway. Especially with Bluetooth Low Energy pushing into > the turf of ZigBee. So please use proper names and not confuse people > with IEEE numbers ;) This gonna happen, as we are most probably going to implement 6lowpan on top of our stack. 6lowpan is a way to encapsulate IPv6 frames into IEEE 802.15.4 and has nothing in common with ZigBee. Moreover ZigBee is a trademark with strict rules upon it's usage. Our lawyers are currently investigating if it's possible to use this name in projects like Linux kernel which are open-source, non-related to any project but OTOH can be encapsulated in any commercial project. IEEE 802.15.4 is a term like IEEE 802.11. We do have mac80211, we have had (until recently) ieee80211 dir, so why bother? For Bluetooth naming directories 'bluetooth' is logical, as 802.15.1 standard is a less known name, doesn't incorporate latest changes from Bluetooth, etc. -- With best wishes Dmitry