Return-path: Received: from L01SLCSMTP02.calltower.com ([69.4.184.249]:3444 "EHLO L01SLCSMTP02.calltower.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751799AbZF3Ot7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:49:59 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH CRDA] Introduce separate HOST and TARGET compilation steps. From: Jon Loeliger To: Johannes Berg Cc: "John W. Linville" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "Luis R. Rodriguez" In-Reply-To: <1246345190.16256.1.camel@johannes.local> References: <1246310952.15012.22.camel@jdl-desktop> <1246345190.16256.1.camel@johannes.local> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:50:03 -0500 Message-Id: <1246373403.13176.3.camel@jdl-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 08:59 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 16:29 -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote: > > The regdbdump tool is really a host executable that is used > > during the build process. It could also be installed and > > used on the target, but two separate compilations are needed > > to achieve that goal. > > > > Currently, regdbdump is only built for the target, and thus > > cross-compilation of the tool is really feasible without > > this patch (or one like it). > > I don't think John is the correct addressee, Luis maintains this still, Oh! Sorry! > afaik. The only thing I'm not sure about is the separation into host/ > and target/, Do you have another suggestion? Another approach would be to leave the "target" stuff in the top-level directory straight up, and bury the build of the host "tools" in a sub-directory? > but otherwise this seems ok to me. Thanks. > johannes jdl