Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:23034 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754214AbZGLO5a (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:57:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20090712105807.g85wo8lpgk04k8gk-cebfxv@webmail.spamcop.net> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:58:07 -0400 From: Pavel Roskin To: Dave Cc: orinoco-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, David Gerard , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Orinoco-devel] orinoco-usb in 2.6.31? References: <4A577DA9.9000205@gmail.com> <4A57DC26.4090708@gmail.com> <4A58FC5C.8060204@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A58FC5C.8060204@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Quoting Dave : > The rebasing was a little painful due to all the changes that have been > happening on orinoco. However I think I'm done. I have an impression that orinoco-usb should be submitted to the staging tree. Perhaps its symbols should be renamed to allow it to coexist with the plain orinoco driver, even if both are linked into the kernel. I was hoping that we would reorganize the orinoco driver to allow orinoco-usb to be one of its frontends, but it's not happening. All the efforts that go into orinoco-usb is keeping it up-to-date with the kernel. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin