Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:57833 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755060AbZG2BbU (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:31:20 -0400 Subject: Re: 31-rc3-mmotm0716 - wonky wireless statistics.. From: Zhu Yi To: "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" , Johannes Berg Cc: Andrew Morton , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <5934.1248814870@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> References: <5934.1248814870@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:31:18 +0800 Message-Id: <1248831078.3747.1117.camel@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 05:01 +0800, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > Dell Latitude D820 laptop, lspci reports the network card as: > > 0c:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG [Golan] Netwo rk Connection (rev 02) > > iwlwifi driver in use, card associated via wpa_supplicant but not being > actively used > > # iwconfig > wlan0 IEEE 802.11abg ESSID:"VT-Wireless" > Mode:Managed Frequency:2.447 GHz Access Point: 00:11:20:A4:4C:10 > Bit Rate=54 Mb/s Tx-Power=15 dBm > Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off > Encryption key: [2] > Link Quality=62/70 Signal level=-48 dBm > Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0 > Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0 > # cat /proc/net/wireless > Inter-| sta-| Quality | Discarded packets | Missed | WE > face | tus | link level noise | nwid crypt frag retry misc | beacon | 22 > wlan0: 0000 63. -47. -256 0 0 0 0 0 0 > wlan1: 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > wlan2: 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > Where did that -256 for "noise" come from? It ends up confusing the > gkrellm-wifi plugin, it reports a S/N of 219dB ;) This should be related to http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-testing.git;a=commit;h=fdb897ea5c77836f890033d563336ab0c94c9222 But I don't think this is an ABI broken. User space should parse the trailing '.' to see if a field is updated or not because there are cards not capable to report hardware noise level anyway. Johannes? Thanks, -yi