Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:19001 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755384AbZF3WmM (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:42:12 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Introduce separate HOST and TARGET compilation steps. From: Pavel Roskin To: Jon Loeliger Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <1246396772.13176.264.camel@jdl-desktop> References: <1246396772.13176.264.camel@jdl-desktop> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:42:13 -0400 Message-Id: <1246401733.31826.26.camel@mj> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 16:19 -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote: > +TARGET_CFLAGS += -Wall -g That's a misleading name. There is nothing wrong with using CFLAGS for compilation. "target" normally refers to the system for which the program being compiled would create or manipulate binaries. CRDA doesn't manipulate system-dependent binaries. It's not a compiler or an assembler. It works with a system-independent database. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin