Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:24100 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751347AbZG2V3S (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:29:18 -0400 Subject: Re: ar9170 DWA 160A From: Pavel Roskin To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: linux-wireless , otus-devel@lists.madwifi-project.org, Felix Bitterli In-Reply-To: <43e72e890907281646x731bfcc3v62f17e21bd94bb4@mail.gmail.com> References: <43e72e890907281646x731bfcc3v62f17e21bd94bb4@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:29:15 -0400 Message-Id: <1248902955.4253.10.camel@mj> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 16:46 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > We have these listed on ar9170 wiki page as under Dlink DWA160A: > > 0x07d1:0x3c10 > 0x0846:0x9010 > > A user just reported thy purchased DWA160 by mistake thinking it was > the same but it turns out it has some other wireless chipset. Do any > of you have a DWA160A that is claimed by ar9170 or should we remove > this from the list? The D-Link site doesn't mention DWA160A or DWA-160A at all. It has DWA-160 only. When downloading the drivers, there is a choice between "DWA-160" and "DWA-160_REVB". The former has Atheros drivers, the later has rt2870. I guess the original "DWA-160" was "rev A", so it could have transformed to "DWA-160A" somewhere. That said, the online retailers sell "DWA-160" and not "DWA-160A". I think we can write that DWA-160 rev A is supported by ar9170 and DWA-160 rev B is supported by rt2870 in the staging tree. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin