Return-path: Received: from mx51.mymxserver.com ([85.199.173.110]:1960 "EHLO mx51.mymxserver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752635AbZGWIah (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:30:37 -0400 From: Holger Schurig To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Subject: Re: Update for regulatory database on 5GHz band for Thailand (TH) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:31:48 +0200 Cc: David Quan , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Michael Green References: <15B47C78534E094AA9A41F58FB8D74F30147BE67876F@SC1EXMB-MBCL.global.atheros.com> <43e72e890907220941j70f5ca98g5af9d9372eeef2e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43e72e890907220941j70f5ca98g5af9d9372eeef2e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <200907231031.48801.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > (5170 - 5250 @ 20), (3, 17) > (5250 - 5330 @ 20), (3, 20), DFS Is it an error to have the same frequency listed twice (once in the "from" column, once in the "till" column? And if yes, does frequency 5250 get's assigned "(3, 17)" or "(3, 20), DFS" ??? If it's an error, then maybe the regdb-compiler should emit a warning about this. -- http://www.holgerschurig.de