Return-path: Received: from L01SLCSMTP02.calltower.com ([69.4.184.249]:44959 "EHLO L01SLCSMTP02.calltower.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753027AbZGAU5Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:57:24 -0400 Subject: Re: Compiling wpa_supplicant? From: Jon Loeliger To: Johannes Berg Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <1246473271.8154.5.camel@johannes.local> References: <1246467053.11632.13.camel@jdl-desktop> <1246473271.8154.5.camel@johannes.local> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:57:28 -0500 Message-Id: <1246481848.11632.33.camel@jdl-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 20:34 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 11:50 -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote: > > > Is there a version of hostapd/wpa_suppliant that is more > > up-to-date WRT libnl-2.0? Or should I just use the wext > > driver for now? > > I would suggest you compile against a released version of libnl, namely > 1.1 :) I was afraid someone would say something like that... :-) And since that seems to be effort in the wrong direction, I was even more afraid someone would say something like: > Otherwise, you can rip the compat code out off iw and stick it > into wpa_supplicant/hostapd. So I did something like that. Patch to follow. > johannes Thanks, jdl