Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f207.google.com ([209.85.219.207]:37840 "EHLO mail-ew0-f207.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753234AbZHXVDe (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:03:34 -0400 Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so2780783ewy.18 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:03:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200908241510.10968.herton@mandriva.com.br> References: <200908220038.35564.herton@mandriva.com.br> <3ace41890908221459j70e31c20ufa5ea03973a16e0a@mail.gmail.com> <3ace41890908231238h32b85839qe74bce2852103402@mail.gmail.com> <200908241510.10968.herton@mandriva.com.br> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:03:35 +0100 Message-ID: <3ace41890908241403x31579c79x226fee6a6cd06e5b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] rtl8187: Implement rfkill support From: Hin-Tak Leung To: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Larry Finger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote: > This is strange, may be NetworkManager does something extra and for some reason > manages to wake up the interface again? I thought it would be unable to "if up" > the interface since -ERFKILL should be returned to it when switch is off... > >> >> Is this intentional? I thought it is supposed to actually switch off >> the hardware, or is this how the code supposed to work? >> Maybe some component needs to let NM knows not to reenanble the device. > > About taking interface down, thats expected, but I don't know about > NetworkManager, I was expecting it to be unable to "if up" the interface again. Is there a minimum version of NM/wpa_supplicant this is expected? I could upgrade if needed to. I am mostly fedora 11 based and have NM 0.7.1-8.git20090708 , wpa_supplicant 0.6.8. Hin-Tak