Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:54008 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752966AbZHFSlM (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:41:12 -0400 Subject: Re: CRDA and cross-compilation From: Pavel Roskin To: "Philip A. Prindeville" Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Jon Loeliger , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4A7B2163.4030805@redfish-solutions.com> References: <4A7A8F7E.6020503@redfish-solutions.com> <1249569993.6446.2.camel@jdl-desktop> <1249576886.14919.16.camel@mj> <43e72e890908060956j3548c23ak4cf98d11c32efec0@mail.gmail.com> <1249580707.14919.29.camel@mj> <4A7B2163.4030805@redfish-solutions.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:41:11 -0400 Message-Id: <1249584071.19169.7.camel@mj> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 11:30 -0700, Philip A. Prindeville wrote: > Dumb question but, why not just build a target and host version each of regdumpdb? Because it's more complicated. Because we may want to disable verification for reasons other than cross-compiling. Because it's already possible: set -e make verify REG_BIN=/targetfs/regulatory.bin make clean make all_noverify CC=cross-gcc -- Regards, Pavel Roskin