Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219]:35568 "EHLO mail-bw0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752522AbZHBKne (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Aug 2009 06:43:34 -0400 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so1973195bwz.37 for ; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 03:43:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1249199143.2007.2.camel@johannes.local> References: <1249169809-11853-1-git-send-email-tomas.winkler@intel.com> <1249171448.3491.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1ba2fa240908012249s348a2412wca21de44f9b8cb71@mail.gmail.com> <1249199143.2007.2.camel@johannes.local> Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 13:43:33 +0300 Message-ID: <1ba2fa240908020343j7308e215vc1914244c8cd191a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rfkill: add the GPS radio type From: Tomas Winkler To: Johannes Berg Cc: Marcel Holtmann , linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 08:49 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > >> > we don't have a GPS subsystem, but even without it, I think this is a >> > good thing to have. >> >> GPS devices are usually serial devices. > > Yeah, this is interesting -- do we want something like /dev/urfkill > (cf. /dev/uinput), so that gpsd or whatever is controlling the GPS (same > applies for 3G) can be controlled with rfkill? Sorry don't know much about /dev/uinput what is difference between /dev/urfkill and /dev/rfkill, can you be, please more verbose Thanks Tomas