Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219]:34359 "EHLO mail-bw0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932824AbZHDQEL convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:04:11 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200908032217.19947.IvDoorn@gmail.com> References: <200908031931.27427.chris2553@googlemail.com> <200908032217.19947.IvDoorn@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:04:10 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bug #13846] Possible regression in rt61pci driver From: Chris Clayton To: Ivo van Doorn Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Thanks Ivo, 2009/8/3 Ivo van Doorn : > Hi, > >> On Sunday 02 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> > of recent regressions. >> > >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> > from 2.6.30. ?Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know >> > (either way). >> > >> >> The folks on the wireless project have concluded that the problem I reported is down to a hardware >> problem when power saving is switched on on for my Belkin cardbus wireless adapter, so now I simply >> turn power-saving off when wlan0 comes up. I did, however, ask whether anyone was going to fix the >> fact that once power-saving turns the LEDs off, they never come back on again, but I haven't had an >> answer. Is that a regression? I guess the answer is no, because power saving in the rt61pci driver >> is feature that is new to 2.6.31. Should it be fixed? I think the answer is yes, but being unable >> to do it myself, I probably don't have a vote :-) > > Can't recall this issue was ever reported, but that might just be me having overlooked some emails > or have completely forgotten all about it. But here is a test patch to see if this helps in the issue, > it is not really correct for upstream, but if it works I can see if there is a better solution. > > Thanks, > I've tried the patch without success. The card doesn't seem to wake up again when I attempt network activity after PS has activated. (Actually, There are two assumptions I should check out here. Firstly, the LEDS going out is a sign that PS has activated and secondly, that the card should "wake up" if I attempt network activity after PS has activated). A cut and paste from the console window: [chris:~]$ iwconfig lo no wireless extensions. wmaster0 no wireless extensions. wlan0 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:"SKY28767" Mode:Managed Frequency:2.412 GHz Access Point: 00:1F:33:80:09:44 Bit Rate=1 Mb/s Tx-Power=10 dBm Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off Power Management:on Link Quality=50/70 Signal level=-60 dBm Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0 Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0 [chris:~]$ echo "waiting for leds to go out" waiting for leds to go out [chris:~]$ ping router PING router.local.lan (192.168.0.1) from 192.168.0.30 : 56(84) bytes of data. >From laptop.local.lan (192.168.0.30): Destination Host Unreachable >From laptop.local.lan (192.168.0.30): Destination Host Unreachable >From laptop.local.lan (192.168.0.30): Destination Host Unreachable >From laptop.local.lan (192.168.0.30): Destination Host Unreachable >From laptop.local.lan (192.168.0.30): Destination Host Unreachable >From laptop.local.lan (192.168.0.30): Destination Host Unreachable >From laptop.local.lan (192.168.0.30): Destination Host Unreachable >From laptop.local.lan (192.168.0.30): Destination Host Unreachable >From laptop.local.lan (192.168.0.30): Destination Host Unreachable ^C --- router.local.lan ping statistics --- 11 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, +9 errors, 100% packet loss [chris:~]$ To get the card going again I had to physically remove and reinsert it. Chris > Ivo > --- > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00config.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00config.c > index 3845316..6fe70b1 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00config.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00config.c > @@ -196,6 +196,12 @@ void rt2x00lib_config(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev, > ? ? ? ? */ > ? ? ? ?rt2x00dev->ops->lib->config(rt2x00dev, &libconf, ieee80211_flags); > > + ? ? ? if (ieee80211_flags & IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_PS) { > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? rt2x00led_led_activity(rt2x00dev, !(conf->flags & IEEE80211_CONF_PS)); > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? rt2x00leds_led_assoc(rt2x00dev, !(conf->flags & IEEE80211_CONF_PS)); > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? rt2x00leds_led_radio(rt2x00dev, !(conf->flags & IEEE80211_CONF_PS)); > + ? ? ? } > + > ? ? ? ?/* > ? ? ? ? * Some configuration changes affect the link quality > ? ? ? ? * which means we need to reset the link tuner. > -- No, Sir; there is nothing which has yet been contrived by man, by which so much happiness is produced as by a good tavern or inn - Doctor Samuel Johnson