Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f215.google.com ([209.85.220.215]:35238 "EHLO mail-fx0-f215.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752209AbZHNSMJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:12:09 -0400 Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so1316077fxm.39 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:12:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1250273426.4411.0.camel@johannes.local> References: <43e72e890908131331q371320a3gf1ab53ea27574549@mail.gmail.com> <4A859F52.1000608@gmail.com> <1250273426.4411.0.camel@johannes.local> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor_Stefanik?= Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:11:49 +0200 Message-ID: <69e28c910908141111g171c1a23qc2d49992468ddf44@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Spare warnings - wireless drivers To: Johannes Berg Cc: Dave , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , linux-wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 18:30 +0100, Dave wrote: > >> I've been staring at setibssport for 5 minutes, and can't see the >> alleged imbalance. False positive? >> >> I can't see why sparse picked on setibssport either - half the other >> functions in that file do exactly the same. > > Yeah, I've been there too -- no idea why that particular function trips > up sparse. > > johannes > It's literally a sparse warning, then. -- Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-)