Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:44864 "EHLO
	smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752026AbZHESbD (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:31:03 -0400
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:17:26 -0400
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Phattanon Duangdara <sfalpha@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: TH gets 5 GHz enabled as of new
	regulatory rules
Message-ID: <20090805181726.GC20338@tuxdriver.com>
References: <1248285108-10059-1-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <f7de31c0907290313x148e2851i26df034c8e701a8c@mail.gmail.com> <43e72e890907290818t62515b61p2f30278b690f22c@mail.gmail.com> <f7de31c0907292242s7c41daefr6ca7b3423180d005@mail.gmail.com> <f7de31c0907292246h6002e9bdod9691c2f24456017@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
In-Reply-To: <f7de31c0907292246h6002e9bdod9691c2f24456017@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:46:29PM +0700, Phattanon Duangdara wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Luis R.
> Rodriguez<lrodriguez@atheros.com> wrote:
> > Note: this e-mail is in a public mailing list.
> >
> > Adding Michael and David. Michael, I'd appreciate your review on this,
> > if possible.
> >
> > Phattanon, thanks for your review of the TH document and sharing it
> > with us. Please see my reply inline below.
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Phattanon Duangdara<sfalpha@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I corrected redgb from my knowledge.
> >
> > Did you see my patch? I corrected TH to be:
> >
> > country TH:
> > ? ? ? ?(2402 - 2482 @ 20), (N/A, 20)
> > ? ? ? ?(5170 - 5250 @ 20), (3, 17)
> > ? ? ? ?(5250 - 5330 @ 20), (3, 20), DFS
> > ? ? ? ?(5490 - 5710 @ 20), (3, 20), DFS
> > ? ? ? ?(5735 - 5835 @ 20), (3, 30)
> >
> >> For 5150-5350 is for Indoor Use Only.
> >> Most of the regulartory
> >
> > What do you mean by that? Do you mean that the document refers to FCC
> > and ETSI/ITU standard for regulatory purposes for some items?
> >
> >> refer _either_ FCC or ETSI/ITU standard, so I
> >> guess that from the document 40MHz can also be used (same as US)
> >> because TH regulatory mostly cover all bandwidth on 40MHz.
> >
> > Are you saying the Thailand document refers to FCC for max allowed
> > bandwidth spacing and therefore US max bandwidth spacing should be
> > used (ie allow 40 MHz width channels)?
> 
> I am not sure about this. But if equipment that comply with FCC
> standard allow to use 40MHz, I think we can because, for example
> Translated rule for 2.4GHz says

<snip>

So, is the patch from Luis wrong?  If so, what is the correct patch?

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.
			?Viva Honduras Libre!